Archive for the 'controversy' Category

“Search Neutrality” is silly…

Friday, April 30th, 2010

In the ongoing war between ISPs and the big network content providers over net neutrality, a new weapon has been unveiled. Apparently, the ISPs (who don’t want net neutrality) have accused Google (their primary adversary in the war) of the same things they are guilty of, and that Google must accept “search neutrality” as a [...]

Apple v. Adobe

Friday, April 30th, 2010

The great Steve has spoken from his high mountain, and he is displeased. Apparently his Thoughts on Flash have created a bit of a stir.
Maybe it’s just me (or not), but: Pot? Kettle?
The main reason I haven’t broken down and bought an iPhone or iTouch is because I’m morally opposed to Apple’s walled garden of [...]

Response: Global Warming

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

This is a response to Phil’s Global Warming post (also posted as a reply on his site):
First, there is no “correct” amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere - the concentration has varied dramatically throughout history, sometimes being many times the current value (such as during the Mesozoic Era). Using the weight of carbon dioxide [...]

A Response to the Tao of Zen Nihilism

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

This is in response to a blog post by John Wick (via Declassified). The first chief premise is that D&D 4E will not be a role-playing game, at least insofar as it does not fit his definition of a role-playing game:
A roleplaying game is a game in which the players are rewarded for making [...]

Politeness in Rejection

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

A response letter from the Smithsonian institute in regard to a recently submitted archaeological specimen. Just precious.
Now if only I could be so politic when addressing the wild claims of those around me. It’s especially fitting because a good friend of mine recently gave me a thirty-page treatise on why the theory of [...]